_____________________________________________________________
Accomack
Elizabeth B. Waters, planning consultant
INTRODUCTION
In
the Summer of 2004 the Accomack County Board of Supervisors agreed to develop a
strategic plan to guide important policy and investment decisions over the next
three years. During the Fall of 2004 and
early Winter 2005 they held a series of meetings to develop the plan. Discussion focused on patterns and trends,
strengths and weaknesses, and needs and opportunities in the county. The Board also identified elements of a
long-term vision for
The
Board used the outcomes of these discussions to develop a set of priorities for
the next three years. These were refined
in consultation with senior staff and finalized in this plan. The Board recognizes that the county will
continue to provide a wide range of ongoing services not specifically addressed
in this plan. The purpose of this
particular document is to:
-
identify a set of high priority policy
and spending initiatives for
-
focus a significant portion of Board
and staff time and county resources on achieving the priority goals and
benchmarks set forth in the plan.
Patterns and
Trends
As
a first step in the planning process, Board members identified the following
patterns and trends affecting the county that county government needs to be
aware of as it plans for the future.
Demographics
·
There is a steady but not dramatic
increase in population.
·
Forty percent of Accomack's population
is low to moderate income.
·
Retirement age population is expected
to increase over time.
·
The Hispanic population is increasing
significantly.
Housing
·
The pace of residential development is
increasing, with more and larger subdivisions.
·
Much of the new housing development is
second homes.
·
Residential property values are
increasing dramatically.
·
The rise in real estate values is
pricing low-to-moderate income residents out of the housing market.
·
The county has a limited supply of
affordable housing, no multi-family rental housing and a limited number of
sites for mobile homes.
Economic Development
·
Only about 1% of total county land is
in business or industrial use.
·
There is a general lack of employment
diversification in the county.
·
Most new jobs in the county come from
small business development.
·
The largest employers in the county are
poultry processing plants and NASA.
·
Tourism is the sector where the most
economic growth is taking place.
·
Farming is a major contributor to the
local economy. Some farms are being sold
for development but other farmers are leasing land to farm more acreage.
·
Commercial and recreational fishing are
important parts of the local economy.
·
The county's industrial park has
difficulty competing with economic incentives available in
·
Skilled workers often have to be
brought in from
·
Local salaries are not competitive with
those in localities off the
Transportation
·
Traffic on Route 13 is increasing.
·
If traffic continues to increase and no
improvements are made, it will get harder for Route 13 to handle traffic
efficiently.
·
The state has very limited funds for
construction of new roadways or upgrades of current roadways for the
foreseeable future.
Natural Resources
·
Growth is putting additional pressure
on limited groundwater resources.
·
County shoreline is eroding steadily on
both the ocean and bay sides.
·
The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act
protects resources, but is costly to administer.
·
There is some use of conservation
easements to protect land and water quality.
Government Services
·
Growth in population and activities are
putting pressure on county services and can be expected to add more pressure in
the future.
·
Many of the county's new residents
bring expectations of higher levels of services but the revenues are not there
to provide these services.
·
Responsibility for drainage problems
has been shifting from V-DOT to the county as the V-DOT budget has been cut
back.
·
The state provides limited assistance
in key areas like economic development.
·
Accomack has been a major beneficiary
of federal grant money and will be particularly vulnerable if less of that
money is available in the future.
Strength and
Weaknesses
In
addition to identifying patterns and trends, the Board identified county
strengths and weaknesses that need to be considered in developing strategic
priorities for the next three years.
Strengths
People. The people who live in
Quality of Life. Accomack's rural heritage has survived due to
the relative isolation of the county.
The county's history and cultural resources provide a strong sense of
place. Individual towns and hamlets in
Accomack have their own distinct character.
The county's slow pace and good climate are attractive to both residents
and visitors.
Natural Resources. Accomack has a wealth of natural
resources. It has 400 miles of
Small Businesses. The county has many successful small
businesses, including many service businesses and a growing number of artisans.
Local Government Employees. Accomack has dedicated local government
employees who stay with the county a long time and provide continuity in the
delivery of services.
Weaknesses
Isolation. The county's isolation leads to higher costs
for businesses to operate and limited choices for consumers who have to travel
outside the county for many goods and services.
Limited competition in many areas of business also leads to higher
prices.
Inadequate services. The county lacks many services it needs
including centralized wastewater treatment, especially in growing commercial
and industrial areas, adequate medical expertise, group homes for juvenile
offenders and shelters for the homeless.
Lack of recreational facilities. While the county has a
wealth of natural recreational opportunities, it has limited cultural,
recreational and entertainment facilities for youth and others. Also, despite its extensive shoreline, there
is only one public beach in the county.
Limited financial resources. Accomack is one of the poorest counties in
the state. Most jobs are relatively
low-paying. The county is heavily
dependent on outside funding from the state and federal governments to meet its
service needs.
Environmental vulnerability. The county has limited groundwater and the
groundwater is vulnerable to contamination.
The shoreline is subject to erosion and drainage is a major problem.
Inadequate attention to countywide issues. Election by district has led local officials
to focus on district rather than county-wide issues, resulting in failure to
adequately address infrastructure development, waste disposal, planning, zoning
and other key county-wide issues.
Issues and
Opportunities
Board
members identified major issues and opportunities facing the county over the
next 3-5 years. They agreed it was
important to focus on issues with county-wide implications in setting top
priorities for the next three years and they identified twelve major issue
/opportunity areas for consideration.
Land-use planning and zoning. The county's zoning ordinance needs a number
of changes to address things like density and lot size for residential growth
and appropriate locations for mobile homes.
The use of proffers needs to be revisited. The county's comprehensive plan needs to be
updated. This is an area that includes
both short and long-term issues and is crucial to addressing growth, affordable
housing and other related issues.
Waste Management. The county faces many waste management issues:
trash collection, landfill closure and financial liability, and centralized
wastewater treatment to facilitate economic development. This area includes things that can be
addressed in the near term as well as a number that are long-term issues.
Transportation.
The recent Route 13 study identified a number of issues and
opportunities related to this corridor.
Short-term the county could take steps to manage development in the
corridor using such things as an entrance corridor over-lay district to limit
curb cuts and maintain an attractive and well-functioning corridor. Major improvements to Route 13 are a
longer-term issue that will require significant state funds.
Drainage. This is a county-wide
problem and not one that can be addressed one small section of ditch at a
time. There needs to be a county-wide
plan and strategy for how to address this.
This is a long-term issue for Accomack, but a committee has been
appointed and development of a plan could be a short-term priority.
Resource Protection.
This will always be an issue in Accomack given its wealth of natural
resources, its limited groundwater supply, and other environmental
vulnerabilities. There are a number of groups
and programs already in place to address this including the Bay Act and the
regional groundwater committee.
Affordable Housing. Accomack county needs
more affordable housing. The county
needs to explore a variety of ways to achieve this through zoning, performance
standards, proffers, and other strategies.
This is both a short and a long-term problem.
Economic Development. The county has had
difficulty marketing its industrial park and planning for the Wallops business
park. Developing centralized wastewater
treatment capacity in key locations is important to all kinds of economic
development in the county. Without it,
economic development planning and marketing are likely to meet with limited
success. Developing this infrastructure
will take time and major federal, state and local funding, but the process
could begin in the near-term.
Cultural Heritage Preservation. Accomack's history and historic resources are
among its greatest assets but there is no inventory of historic buildings and
sites. This makes them more vulnerable
to being lost to future development.
Properties listed on the national and state registers of historic places
could serve as a starting point for this inventory.
Recreation.
The county is rich in natural recreational resources but does not have
adequate community recreation opportunities for youth. Some recreational programs and activities
exist for young people but they are not fully coordinated or easily accessible
to everyone in the community. There is
also limited public access to the waterfront.
Capital Improvements.
The county has a number of capital improvement needs it will have to
address in the near future. It needs to
complete the allocation of funds for the
Government Administration. There are at least two county administration
issues that need to be addressed. One is
the need for a formal capital improvements program (CIP) that integrates
capital spending priorities into the budget process. The other is the need to revisit how the
property assessment process will be carried out in the future on a regular
basis.
Long-term
Vision
After
identification and consideration of the patterns and trends, strengths and
weaknesses, and issues and opportunities facing the county, Board members were
asked to identify elements of their long-term vision for the county. There was general consensus on the following
desired vision for the future of the county.
·
The rural character and natural beauty
of the county will be preserved.
·
Growth and development in the county
will be well managed.
·
There will be employment growth in
tourism, service industries and through business and industrial park
development.
·
There will be growth in housing,
cultural, and recreational opportunities that will meet the needs of families,
youth and young professionals.
·
Route 13 will be an attractive travel
corridor that serves the needs of residents, businesses and tourists.
·
The county will balance growing service
needs with the revenue available to fund those needs.
Board
members agreed it will take policy and organizational changes and targeted
spending on the part of local government to achieve this desired future. They expressed particular concern that
unmanaged growth could threaten the character and quality of life in the
county. They also emphasized the need to
rise above parochial or district concerns and take actions needed to promote
the well being of the entire county and all of its residents and businesses.
The
Board recognized it could not address all issue and opportunity areas they identified
over the next three years. After
considerable discussion, they identified six priority action areas:
-
planning and zoning;
-
solid waste collection;
-
centralized wastewater treatment;
-
capital improvement program;
-
property reassessment process; and
-
strategic thinking integrated into
decision-making.
The
next section of this plan outlines the strategic priorities the Board has
agreed to pursue in these six areas over the next three years. It includes specific goals, actions and
benchmarks for addressing these priorities.
In developing and adopting this plan, the Board is committing itself to
work together with staff to see that substantial energy and resources are
committed to carrying out this agenda over the next three years. The plan will be reviewed annually to assess
progress and revise the agenda as needed to reflect new circumstances and
conditions.
THREE-YEAR PRIORITIES: 2005-2007
GOAL #1: Revise the
|
Actions |
Timeframe |
|
1.
Develop and adopt an initial over-lay
district for Route 13 corridor as recommended in the 2.
Prepare staff report on full range of
tools available to the county to manage growth: location of infrastructure,
zoning proffers, etc. and make recommendations to the Board on actions to
take 3.
Develop transportation element to add
to county comprehensive plan. 4.
Complete revision of county
comprehensive plan. 5.
Revise county land use plan to
reflect desired growth patterns 6.
Revise county zoning ordinance to
implement the plan and address growth management, economic development,
affordable housing and other concerns. 7.
Develop countywide drainage element
to add to comprehensive plan. |
2005, 2006 2005, 2006 2005 2005, 2006 2006, 2007 2006, 2007 2007 |
Benchmarks:
·
Adopt initial Route 13 corridor
over-lay district by December 2005.
·
Adopt transportation element for
comprehensive plan by December 2005.
·
Complete staff report on growth
management tools by December 2005.
·
Adopt revised comprehensive plan by
December 2006.
·
Adopt revised land-use plan by December
2006.
·
Adopt revisions to county zoning
ordinance to implement the comprehensive. plan and address growth management
concerns by May 2007.
·
Adopt drainage element of comprehensive
plan by May 2007.
Goal #2: Establish strategically located solid waste convenience
centers to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of solid waste collection
in the County.
|
Actions |
Timeframe |
|
1.
Begin construction on a staffed
convenience center at Fisher's Corner. 2.
Complete development of criteria to
guide decisions regarding the number and location of additional convenience
centers needed to provide countywide service 3.
Based on the criteria, identify the
general areas in which the additional collection sites should be located to
meet the needs of the county. 4.
Develop staff proposal for how to
finance additional centers. 5.
Develop and begin implementation of
an anti-litter education and outreach program to implement along with the new
collection system. 6.
Continue to identify potential sites
for additional collection centers within the general areas identified by the
criteria, including but not limited to former school sites and other
county-owned property. 7.
Purchase, lease or take other steps
to secure appropriate sites as they become available. 8.
Establish one additional center per
year as funding allows until the system is fully in place |
2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005, 2006, 2007 2006, 2007 2006, 2007 |
Benchmarks:
·
Have convenience center under
construction at Fisher's Corner by December
2005.
·
Have criteria and a plan for future
convenience centers adopted by December
2005.
·
Have staff proposal for financing
additional centers complete by December 2005.
·
Have anti-litter campaign underway by
December 2005.
·
Have one or more additional convenience
centers called for in the plan established by May 2007 or as funding allows.
Goal #3: Develop centralized wastewater treatment capacity in key
locations to address economic development and environmental quality concerns.
|
Actions |
Timeframe |
|
1.
Carry out feasibility studies to
determine how to meet centralized wastewater treatment needs for the Onancock
area in central 2.
Work with NASA and other partners to
identify the most appropriate way to govern and manage the new wastewater
treatment capacity. 3.
Use the information in the feasibility
studies to pursue funding to support engineering and construction of the
proposed new facilities. 4.
Based on the results of the
feasibility studies, identify service area boundaries and initiate
preliminary engineering for the new facilities 5.
Adopt local laws and procedures
related to hook-up and use of the new facilities. 6.
Complete final engineering and begin
the construction of the new infrastructure in central and northern Accomack
as soon as funding is secured. |
2005 2005 2005, 2006 2006 2006 2007 and beyond |
Benchmarks:
·
Complete needs assessments for new
capacity in central and northern Accomack by September 2005.
·
Have staff recommendation on governance
structure(s) for the new facilities by July 2005 and the Board's decision by
December 2005.
·
Have the new governance structure in
place and secure funding to do preliminary engineering by June 2006.
·
Make decisions on service area
boundaries and begin preliminary engineering by December 2006.
·
Adopt local policies related to hook-up
and use of the system by December 2006.
·
Complete final engineering and begin
construction in 2007 or as funding allows.
Goal #4: Develop a formal Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the
County and update it annually.
|
Actions |
Timeframe |
|
1.
Hold a work session with the Planning
Commission to discuss the CIP purpose and planning process. 2.
Have staff develop an initial CIP
framework to bring to the Planning Commission and the public. 3.
Work with the Planning Commission to
develop and adopt an initial CIP. 4.
Use the CIP to guide capital spending
decisions in Spring 2006 budget deliberations. 5.
Revisit the CIP in late 2006 and
early 2007 and amend it as necessary. 6.
Use the CIP to guide capital spending
decisions in Spring 2007 budget deliberations. |
2005 2005 2005, 2006 2006 2006, 2007 2007 |
Benchmarks:
·
Adopt an initial CIP in late 2005 or
early 2006 to guide capital spending decisions in Spring 2006.
·
Adopt a revised CIP and use it to guide
Spring 2007 capital spending decisions.
Goal #5: Develop and implement a process for regular property
reassessment in the county .
|
Actions |
Timeframe |
|
1.
Have staff prepare a report on
options for handling regular property reassessments in the county. 2.
Adopt a method and schedule for
carrying out reassessments. 3.
Use multidisciplinary teams to
identify ways to maximize service and efficiency in providing development
related services to individuals and businesses doing development in the
County. 4.
Implement recommended changes in how
development services are delivered. 5.
Carry out property reassessment
according to the method and schedule adopted by the Board. |
2005 2005 2005 2005, 2006 2006, 2007 |
Benchmarks:
·
Adopt a method and schedule for
carrying out regular reassessments by December 2005.
·
Implement changes to maximize the
quality and efficiency of development related county services by December 2006.
·
Conduct one property reassessment
according to the process and schedule adopted by the Board by May 2007.
Goal #6: Integrate strategic thinking about major issues facing the
county into county planning and decision-making.
|
Actions |
Timeframe |
|
1.
Adopt a strategic plan to set major
county-wide priorities for the next three years and use this plan to set work
agendas for the Board and staff. 2.
Share Board strategic priorities with
the PDC, other partners and the public at large and use these as a basis for
adopting policies setting spending priorities, applying for grants, etc. 3.
Schedule quarterly work sessions on
strategic issues as identified by Board members, staff, VACO or members of
the public to anticipate problems and opportunities before they occur. (Strategic issues suggested for
consideration include long-term waste disposal planning with 4.
Set staff performance standards based
on the Board's strategic priorities and use these in conducting annual
evaluations. 5.
Conduct six month reviews of the
strategic plan, assess progress and make changes as needed. |
2005 2005. 2006, 2007 2005, 2006, 2007 2005, 2006, 2007 2005, 2006, 2007 |
Benchmarks:
·
Adopt three-year strategic plan by
·
Hold four strategic work sessions by
December 2005 and another four by December 2006.
·
Complete reviews of progress on the
strategic plan in June 2005, January and June 2006, and January 2007.
·
Conduct annual staff performance reviews
in 2005 and 2006 that include evaluation of progress on the strategic plan.
Conclusion
The
Accomack County Board of Supervisors is committed to completing the activities
and achieving the goals outlined in this plan over the next three years. We believe that making these strategic
priorities a reality will improve the services provided to county residents and
businesses and will prepare the county to manage future growth and development
in ways that will preserve and enhance the quality of life in the county.